Universe SandboxGeneral CategoryAstronomy & ScienceBig exoplanets in a really tight embrace !
Pages: 1
PrintPrint
Author Topic: Big exoplanets in a really tight embrace !  (Read 567 times)
APODman
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 176



WWW
« on: August 20, 2010, 05:28:40 AM »

"While most extrasolar planets orbit too far from one another to feel each other’s gravity, researchers have found two systems with pairs of gas giant planets locked in an orbital embrace.

In one system—a planetary pair orbiting the massive, dying star HD 200964, located roughly 223 light-years from Earth—the intimate dance is closer and tighter than any previously seen.

“This new planet pair came in an unexpected package,” says John Johnson, an assistant professor of astronomy at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech).

“A planetary system with such closely spaced giant planets would be destroyed quickly if the planets weren’t doing such a well synchronized dance,” adds Eric Ford of the University of Florida in Gainsville. “This makes it a real puzzle how the planets could have found their rhythm.”


More here: http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/alien-planets-dance-around-dying-star/

It would be really awesome if these orbits remain in their current settings for a long time, in the simulation I did shows that they do a great approach at some point in the orbit:



I believe that these orbits can not have little more than a few thousand years since the planets when  encounter at the point where their orbits are closer (MOD - Minimum orbit intersection distance - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki / Minimum_orbit_intersection_distance) certainly pronouncedly affected the orbit of each other (I will go further simulation forward until this meeting) leading even to ejections or collisions of planets.


[ ]´s




* HD 200964 System.ubox (0.78 KB - downloaded 56 times.)
Logged
deoxy99
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 853


Prime Minister of Socialist State of Spheron


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2010, 08:09:10 AM »

MOD - Minimum orbit intersection distance - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_orbit_intersection_distance (for the others)
« Last Edit: August 20, 2010, 02:21:43 PM by deoxy99 » Logged
Bla
Global Moderator

*****
Posts: 736


The stars died so you could live.


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2010, 11:39:48 AM »

fix that url.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_orbit_intersection_distance
Logged
Darvince

*****
Posts: 799


Sailing along the shores of Skirtasia with my cat.


« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2010, 05:25:27 PM »

Is the system fully formed? If so, What the??
Logged
Laura

*****
Posts: 123


« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2010, 12:05:55 PM »

It certainly seems unstable in US2, even at an accuracy of 1 hour per tick and runge-kutta precision.
A cataclysmic event of some sort takes place only about 50 years in. Now, I'm not going to second-guess the professionals based on US2 - perhaps it does work out when relativistic effects are taken into account Smiley
Logged
APODman
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 176



WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2010, 06:52:39 PM »

It certainly seems unstable in US2, even at an accuracy of 1 hour per tick and runge-kutta precision.
A cataclysmic event of some sort takes place only about 50 years in. Now, I'm not going to second-guess the professionals based on US2 - perhaps it does work out when relativistic effects are taken into account Smiley

Great !

I will try simulate the orbital evolution of the planets in the integrator Winorsa (it use relativistic effects )


[ ]´s
Logged
Pages: 1
PrintPrint
Jump to: